Ну конечно! Консенсусное мнение практиков, полностью подтверждённое математическим исследованием Сонаса - это бла-бла-бла. Вот ваш поток сознания, за которым нет абсолютно ничего, интеллектуальный вакуум - это не бла-бла-бла.
Чувак ранжирует умищи по интеллекту в той области, в которой сам ни в зуб ногой.
И правда, но у Вас его предостаточно при этом.
Нужно быть каким-то очень специфическим человеком, чтобы не увидеть, что расхождения практически не было 10 лет назад, и оно нарастает год от года, причём началось это с низов, а сейчас уже и до верха добралось. И да, внизу оно стало ещё хуже, поэтому и дальше будет только хуже.
Поэтому "бродячий цирк" или кандидаты на него ни в каких опенах и не играют, т.к. играть в них - верный способ из "бродячего цирка" выпасть, даже если ты все их выигрываешь.
Vizvezdenec: Поэтому "бродячий цирк" или кандидаты на него ни в каких опенах и не играют, т.к. играть в них - верный способ из "бродячего цирка" выпасть, даже если ты все их выигрываешь.
До конца не посмотрел, но глядя на то, как Левитов слушает Грищука, могу сказать, что Крамник ему может что угодно втирать про математику и это пройдёт
Vizvezdenec: До конца не посмотрел, но глядя на то, как Левитов слушает Грищука, могу сказать, что Крамник ему может что угодно втирать про математику и это пройдёт
Видео еще не смотрел, но комменты внушают нев..бенный оптимизм по поводу нашего шахматного сообщества.
Vizvezdenec: Поэтому "бродячий цирк" или кандидаты на него ни в каких опенах и не играют, т.к. играть в них - верный способ из "бродячего цирка" выпасть, даже если ты все их выигрываешь.
самая популярная сказка 90-х годов, мнение, разделявшееся в те годы решительно всеми.
Смотрю партию Матлаков — Вэй (Китай — Россия 2015) с комментариями победителя. Читаю: "Немалая заслуга в этом успехе принадлежит тренерскому штабу сборной России, прекрасная античитерская работа которого придала мне необходимую уверенность."
Что? Вообще-то в то время предполагали, что Вэй И не очередной вундеркинд, а чуть ли не андроид с вживлённым движком. Но не серьёзные же люди из сборной! Пришлось перечитать — работа оказалась аналитической.
Grischuk, an esteemed mathematician, has explained, that in order to calculate the probability of someone cheating, one must know the probability of someone cheating.
Как и любой запрет в сетевую эпоху, это только повысит интерес к мнению Крамника и расширит круг его читателей и слушателей. "Эффект Стрейзанд", кажется, называется.
GM Vladimir Kramnik is one of the greatest chess players of all time, and we have enormous respect for him as a chess player. We met with GM Kramnik numerous times to discuss his fair-play concerns, and we established direct communication between him and our Fair Play team to provide an appropriate and expedient venue for discussion. Our team carefully investigated many dozens of players about which GM Kramnik raised suspicions. In the vast majority of cases, we found his accusations baseless.
Unfortunately, GM Kramnik has continued to take his accusations public using his profile and blog on Chess.com. This not only violates Chess.com's terms of service, but also FIDE's code of conduct. GM Kramnik's escalating attacks against some of the most respected members of the chess community and some of it's most promising young talents can no longer be ignored. Consequently, we have now closed GM Kramnik's blog and muted his account.
We have always and will always welcome thoughtful criticism and discussions (such as we have had with many top players for years) around the very real challenge of cheating in chess. GM Kramnik can still reach out to us privately through email or other communication platforms to discuss his suspicions and concerns.
Чесском понять можно, но ведут они себя некорректно. Никакой там коммуникации с Крамником особо не было, а он как бы не последний человек в шахматах, мягко говоря.
Но, как я и говорил, Накамура им дороже, это бабки здесь и сейчас.
Владимир Крамник заявил: "Я собираюсь открыть аккаунт в фейсбуке(запр. в РФ)., о котором сообщу в ближайшие пару дней."
Dear chess fans!
In full accordance with my expectations, the chesscom platform took another step in trying to "shut me up" and unreasonably blocked my blog on their platform and the right to comment publicly on anything there. I have not received any letter from them about the reasons for these actions. As previously, I also did not receive any responses to my statistics publications or even to my complaints about direct threats received from members of their platform.
Indeed, I have repeatedly informed Chess com privately about some extremely suspicious statistical performances of some players, but I have never received a clear reasoned answer, and in most cases, none. This extremely disrespectful attitude towards the former world champion, coupled with an unwillingness to consider cases of obvious statistical anomalies, forced me to act in a public way, for lack of an alternative.
The only promise I received in writing from the management of chesscom, about my correctness in the matter of headphones, and unequivocally The assurance given to me six months ago that the use of headphones is contrary to chesscom's policy and will be prohibited, unfortunately, has not been fulfilled. I admit that this episode undermined my confidence in Chess com. My question a couple of months later, why headphones are still not banned, was ignored.
The only factual response to my (and almost 2,500 signatories to the well-known petition) recent request to Chess com was replete with gross logical and factual errors. Which I have pointed out more than once in my public blog articles on the platform. And again, in response, the "royal" silence.I don't see any reason to block me on the platform since I havent done anything else than publishing the true open source statistics, asking the platform to examine obvious anomalies. Especially since a well-known grandmaster and streamer, who was comprehensively pushed by chesscom, made direct insults to me, and did not suffer any punishment from the platform for this. As well as many other members of the chesscom, who allowed direct insults to my address. These double standards and attempts to drown out the world champion by those "businessmen from chess" are deeply incorrect and will not achieve its goal.
I'm going to open a Facebook account, which I'll report in the next couple of days, where I'll continue to tell the truth and publish statistics chesscom is trying to ignore, no matter how hard they try to stop people from knowing it.
Somehow i feel that http://chess.com is becoming everything that they claimed they weren’t before the merger with chess24 . I love Danny as a person , but the whole trend is making me sad.
Daniel Rensch
I'm really sorry you feel that way, Lev. I understand you may disagree with our decision here, but we feel we simply cannot continue to allow reckless accusations against top players and especially against legitimately talented juniors to be published on our platform.
I don’t think it’s fair that the feelings of those being accused be taken for granted either, especially juniors and without any proof. Vladimir is by no means silenced. He can (and I'm sure will), continue to make accusations and discuss cheating on other platforms - just not ours - and I’m hoping to have more productive conversations without involving innocent people in the public crossfire of his opinions.
Yes, maybe Kramnik goes ahead and does not mince words, but your platform cannot cope with cheating. As they say, accepting a problem is the first step to solving it. Try this instead of sanctioning one of the best players in chess history.
You can not expect to enter someone's house and expect free speech. There are rules you have to agree to, just as if someone had entered your house you would eventually kick them out if they violated the rules. It's that simple.
The argument from some that Kramnik is being "silenced" because his Chess.com blog is muted, is just nonsense. There are a ton of (better) platforms where you can publish and share your views and opinions without restrictions, if one bans you, you are not silenced.
Somehow i feel that http://chess.com is becoming everything that they claimed they weren’t before the merger with chess24 . I love Danny as a person , but the whole trend is making me sad.
Daniel Rensch
I'm really sorry you feel that way, Lev. I understand you may disagree with our decision here, but we feel we simply cannot continue to allow reckless accusations against top players and especially against legitimately talented juniors to be published on our platform.
I don’t think it’s fair that the feelings of those being accused be taken for granted either, especially juniors and without any proof. Vladimir is by no means silenced. He can (and I'm sure will), continue to make accusations and discuss cheating on other platforms - just not ours - and I’m hoping to have more productive conversations without involving innocent people in the public crossfire of his opinions.
Emilchess
And I even don't block @PHChess
А Крамник кого-то обвинял? Я видел пару видео, где он говорил о подозрительной статистике, но прямых обвинений не было.
