|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2710 in Leipzig, 1879, scoring 8/8 (100%) vs 2476-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-9998 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2739 in Marco-Weiss Match (Vienna), 1895, scoring 5.5/7 (79%) vs 2650-rated opposition
2708 in New York, 1889, scoring 20.5/32 (64%) vs 2589-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-9999 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2722 in Teichmann-von Bardeleben Match (Berlin), 1895, scoring 6/10 (60%) vs 2700-rated opposition
2710 in von Bardeleben-von Gottschall II (Berlin), 1895, scoring 4/5 (80%) vs 2648-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10000 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2784 in Blackburne-Gunsberg II (Bradford), 1887, scoring 8/13 (62%) vs 2744-rated opposition
2753 in Bradford, 1888, scoring 10.5/13 (81%) vs 2582-rated opposition
2717 in Chigorin-Gunsberg Match (Havana), 1890, scoring 11.5/23 (50%) vs 2715-rated opposition
2709 in London, 1887, scoring 9.5/13 (73%) vs 2581-rated opposition
2705 in New York, 1889, scoring 20/31 (65%) vs 2584-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10001 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2787 in Budapest, 1896, scoring 10/14 (71%) vs 2676-rated opposition
2783 in Chigorin-Schiffers II (St. Petersburg), 1897, scoring 10/14 (71%) vs 2672-rated opposition
2781 in Hastings, 1895, scoring 12/17 (71%) vs 2659-rated opposition
2764 in Chigorin-Tarrasch Match (St. Petersburg), 1893, scoring 11/22 (50%) vs 2770-rated opposition
2751 in Chigorin-Lasker Match (Brighton), 1903, scoring 3.5/6 (58%) vs 2788-rated opposition
2737 in New York, 1889, scoring 20/29 (69%) vs 2589-rated opposition
2717 in Vienna, 1898, scoring 19/34 (56%) vs 2659-rated opposition
2716 in Nuremberg, 1906, scoring 9/13 (69%) vs 2614-rated opposition
2716 in Chigorin-Gunsberg Match (Havana), 1890, scoring 11.5/23 (50%) vs 2715-rated opposition
2716 in London, 1883, scoring 16.5/29 (57%) vs 2655-rated opposition
2702 in London, 1899, scoring 12.5/23 (54%) vs 2667-rated opposition
2701 in Chigorin-Steinitz II (World Championship, Havana), 1892, scoring 10.5/23 (46%) vs 2729-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10002 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2882 in Lasker-Steinitz II (World Championship, Moscow), 1896, scoring 12.5/17 (74%) vs 2754-rated opposition
2878 in London, 1899, scoring 18/22 (82%) vs 2667-rated opposition
2876 in Lasker-Marshall I (World Championship, USA), 1907, scoring 11.5/15 (77%) vs 2738-rated opposition
2853 in St. Petersburg, 1914, scoring 11.5/16 (72%) vs 2738-rated opposition
2833 in Paris, 1900, scoring 11.5/14 (82%) vs 2660-rated opposition
2829 in St. Petersburg, 1895, scoring 11.5/18 (64%) vs 2755-rated opposition
2828 in New York, 1924, scoring 14/18 (78%) vs 2658-rated opposition
2825 in Nurnberg, 1896, scoring 11/14 (79%) vs 2673-rated opposition
2821 in Janowsky-Lasker IV (World Championship, Berlin), 1910, scoring 9.5/11 (86%) vs 2647-rated opposition
2816 in Lasker-Tarrasch II (Berlin), 1916, scoring 5.5/6 (92%) vs 2703-rated opposition
2815 in St. Petersburg, 1909, scoring 12.5/16 (78%) vs 2651-rated opposition
2802 in Lasker-Steinitz I (World Championship, USA/CAN), 1894, scoring 12/19 (63%) vs 2726-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10003 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2853 in Tarrasch-Walbrodt Match (Nuremberg), 1894, scoring 7.5/8 (94%) vs 2689-rated opposition
2846 in Vienna, 1898, scoring 29/39 (74%) vs 2650-rated opposition
2830 in Marshall-Tarrasch Match (Nuremberg), 1905, scoring 12/17 (71%) vs 2715-rated opposition
2798 in Monte Carlo, 1903, scoring 16/22 (73%) vs 2644-rated opposition
2782 in Ostend, 1905, scoring 14.5/22 (66%) vs 2675-rated opposition
2772 in Ostend, 1907, scoring 12.5/20 (63%) vs 2694-rated opposition
2767 in Nurnberg, 1896, scoring 9.5/14 (68%) vs 2676-rated opposition
2761 in Breslau, 1889, scoring 12.5/16 (78%) vs 2589-rated opposition
2757 in San Sebastian, 1912, scoring 11.5/19 (61%) vs 2694-rated opposition
2748 in Manchester, 1890, scoring 13/16 (81%) vs 2554-rated opposition
2747 in Vienna, 1922, scoring 6.5/9 (72%) vs 2667-rated opposition
2746 in Schlechter-Tarrasch Match (Cologne), 1911, scoring 8/16 (50%) vs 2764-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10004 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2731 in Dresden, 1892, scoring 8.5/11 (77%) vs 2596-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10005 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2714 in Nurnberg, 1896, scoring 8/14 (57%) vs 2686-rated opposition
2710 in von Bardeleben-Walbrodt Match (Berlin), 1892, scoring 6/8 (75%) vs 2618-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10006 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2740 in Leipzig, 1894, scoring 8/11 (73%) vs 2635-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10007 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2769 in Berlin, 1897, scoring 12/16 (75%) vs 2620-rated opposition
2748 in Cologne, 1898, scoring 9/12 (75%) vs 2622-rated opposition
2740 in Budapest, 1898, scoring 6/8 (75%) vs 2655-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10008 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2714 in Saratoga Springs, 1899, scoring 6.5/7 (93%) vs 2540-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10009 |
|
|
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10010 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2826 in Vienna, 1898, scoring 28/39 (72%) vs 2649-rated opposition
2805 in Hastings, 1895, scoring 12.5/17 (74%) vs 2666-rated opposition
2790 in Nurnberg, 1896, scoring 10/14 (71%) vs 2680-rated opposition
2769 in Monte Carlo, 1902, scoring 14.5/20 (73%) vs 2620-rated opposition
2759 in Monte Carlo, 1903, scoring 15/22 (68%) vs 2634-rated opposition
2756 in Paris, 1900, scoring 9.5/14 (68%) vs 2664-rated opposition
2756 in Munich, 1900, scoring 12/17 (71%) vs 2630-rated opposition
2744 in St. Petersburg, 1895, scoring 8/18 (44%) vs 2794-rated opposition
2739 in London, 1899, scoring 14/23 (61%) vs 2661-rated opposition
2737 in Pillsbury-Showalter II (New York), 1898, scoring 8/12 (67%) vs 2662-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10011 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2716 in Ostend, 1907, scoring 13.5/20 (68%) vs 2596-rated opposition
2713 in St. Petersburg, 1909, scoring 9.5/16 (59%) vs 2661-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10012 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2811 in London, 1899, scoring 15.5/22 (70%) vs 2674-rated opposition
2810 in Vienna, 1898, scoring 24.5/35 (70%) vs 2651-rated opposition
2779 in Ostend, 1905, scoring 14.5/22 (66%) vs 2672-rated opposition
2776 in Nurnberg, 1896, scoring 9.5/14 (68%) vs 2687-rated opposition
2768 in Cambridge Springs, 1904, scoring 6.5/9 (72%) vs 2692-rated opposition
2759 in Janowsky-Showalter I (New York), 1898, scoring 9/13 (69%) vs 2665-rated opposition
2755 in Monte Carlo, 1902, scoring 12.5/18 (69%) vs 2633-rated opposition
2754 in Ostend, 1907, scoring 11.5/20 (58%) vs 2710-rated opposition
2750 in Hannover, 1902, scoring 9.5/12 (79%) vs 2598-rated opposition
2742 in Janowsky-Marshall III (Suresne), 1908, scoring 6.5/10 (65%) vs 2694-rated opposition
2722 in Monte Carlo, 1901, scoring 8.5/12 (71%) vs 2617-rated opposition
2711 in Leipzig, 1894, scoring 8.5/13 (65%) vs 2633-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10013 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2837 in Ostend, 1905, scoring 16.5/22 (75%) vs 2671-rated opposition
2790 in Monte Carlo, 1903, scoring 16/22 (73%) vs 2635-rated opposition
2773 in Monte Carlo, 1902, scoring 14.5/20 (73%) vs 2625-rated opposition
2769 in London, 1899, scoring 14/22 (64%) vs 2677-rated opposition
2767 in Karlsbad, 1907, scoring 13/18 (72%) vs 2627-rated opposition
2752 in Nurnberg, 1896, scoring 9.5/15 (63%) vs 2684-rated opposition
2748 in Vienna, 1908, scoring 12/17 (71%) vs 2621-rated opposition
2747 in Barmen, 1905, scoring 9.5/13 (73%) vs 2625-rated opposition
2747 in Monte Carlo, 1904, scoring 7.5/10 (75%) vs 2638-rated opposition
2738 in Paris, 1900, scoring 9.5/15 (63%) vs 2668-rated opposition
2733 in Munich, 1900, scoring 9/13 (69%) vs 2634-rated opposition
2731 in Karlsbad, 1923, scoring 10/15 (67%) vs 2637-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10014 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2717 in Ostend, 1905, scoring 12/22 (55%) vs 2685-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10015 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2767 in Karlsbad, 1911, scoring 11/16 (69%) vs 2660-rated opposition
2762 in Mieses-Teichmann II (Berlin), 1910, scoring 6/7 (86%) vs 2640-rated opposition
2745 in Monte Carlo, 1902, scoring 14/21 (67%) vs 2631-rated opposition
2741 in Ostend, 1905, scoring 13/22 (59%) vs 2678-rated opposition
2739 in Leipzig, 1894, scoring 8/11 (73%) vs 2633-rated opposition
2736 in Napier-Teichmann Match (Glasgow), 1905, scoring 7.5/11 (68%) vs 2658-rated opposition
2725 in Monte Carlo, 1903, scoring 13.5/22 (61%) vs 2644-rated opposition
2723 in Spielmann-Teichmann II (Leipzig), 1914, scoring 4/6 (67%) vs 2710-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10016 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2814 in Janowsky-Schlechter II (Karlsbad), 1902, scoring 7.5/10 (75%) vs 2720-rated opposition
2794 in Lasker-Schlechter Match (World Championship, GER/AUT), 1910, scoring 5/10 (50%) vs 2847-rated opposition
2767 in Vienna, 1908, scoring 12.5/17 (74%) vs 2623-rated opposition
2755 in Ostend, 1907, scoring 12/20 (60%) vs 2692-rated opposition
2751 in Prague, 1908, scoring 10.5/15 (70%) vs 2638-rated opposition
2748 in Monte Carlo, 1903, scoring 14.5/22 (66%) vs 2637-rated opposition
2747 in Munich, 1900, scoring 11/16 (69%) vs 2637-rated opposition
2738 in Ostend, 1905, scoring 13/22 (59%) vs 2676-rated opposition
2736 in Ostend, 1906, scoring 6.5/9 (72%) vs 2653-rated opposition
2733 in Budapest, 1896, scoring 6.5/10 (65%) vs 2683-rated opposition
2731 in Vienna, 1898, scoring 19.5/34 (57%) vs 2662-rated opposition
2728 in Karlsbad, 1911, scoring 10/16 (63%) vs 2658-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10017 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2818 in St. Petersburg, 1909, scoring 12.5/16 (78%) vs 2655-rated opposition
2783 in San Sebastian, 1912, scoring 12.5/19 (66%) vs 2686-rated opposition
2769 in Karlsbad, 1907, scoring 13/18 (72%) vs 2630-rated opposition
2763 in Bad Pistyan, 1912, scoring 8.5/11 (77%) vs 2634-rated opposition
2757 in San Sebastian, 1911, scoring 8.5/13 (65%) vs 2687-rated opposition
2756 in Berlin, 1918, scoring 4/6 (67%) vs 2752-rated opposition
2737 in Vienna, 1922, scoring 6.5/9 (72%) vs 2655-rated opposition
2735 in Marienbad, 1925, scoring 9.5/13 (73%) vs 2611-rated opposition
2734 in Baden-Baden, 1925, scoring 11/16 (69%) vs 2623-rated opposition
2728 in Karlsbad, 1911, scoring 10/16 (63%) vs 2657-rated opposition
2727 in Karlsbad, 1929, scoring 12.5/20 (63%) vs 2643-rated opposition
2719 in Ostend, 1906, scoring 6.5/10 (65%) vs 2665-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10018 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2779 in Ostend, 1906, scoring 5/5 (100%) vs 2646-rated opposition
2769 in Vienna, 1908, scoring 12.5/17 (74%) vs 2625-rated opposition
2752 in Prague, 1908, scoring 10.5/15 (70%) vs 2640-rated opposition
2721 in Nuremberg, 1906, scoring 9/13 (69%) vs 2620-rated opposition
2707 in Vienna, 1907, scoring 7/10 (70%) vs 2621-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10021 |
|
|
|
|
(no graph available) |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10022 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2787 in Karlsbad, 1929, scoring 14.5/20 (73%) vs 2640-rated opposition
2778 in Dresden, 1926, scoring 7.5/8 (94%) vs 2595-rated opposition
2771 in San Sebastian, 1912, scoring 12/19 (63%) vs 2692-rated opposition
2755 in Marienbad, 1925, scoring 10/13 (77%) vs 2609-rated opposition
2737 in Frankfurt, 1930, scoring 8.5/10 (85%) vs 2567-rated opposition
2735 in London, 1927, scoring 7/9 (78%) vs 2619-rated opposition
2728 in Hamburg, 1910, scoring 8.5/13 (65%) vs 2653-rated opposition
2726 in San Remo, 1930, scoring 9.5/14 (68%) vs 2629-rated opposition
2725 in Karlsbad, 1907, scoring 11.5/18 (64%) vs 2638-rated opposition
2717 in Berlin, 1928, scoring 7/12 (58%) vs 2691-rated opposition
2717 in New York, 1927, scoring 10.5/20 (53%) vs 2703-rated opposition
2717 in Copenhagen, 1923, scoring 6.5/8 (81%) vs 2591-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10024 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2791 in Karlsbad, 1929, scoring 14.5/20 (73%) vs 2645-rated opposition
2774 in San Sebastian, 1912, scoring 12/19 (63%) vs 2694-rated opposition
2761 in Semmering, 1926, scoring 11/14 (79%) vs 2599-rated opposition
2756 in Reti-Spielmann Match (Vienna), 1921, scoring 4.5/6 (75%) vs 2710-rated opposition
2746 in Bad Pistyan, 1922, scoring 9/12 (75%) vs 2619-rated opposition
2733 in St. Petersburg, 1909, scoring 10/16 (63%) vs 2664-rated opposition
2730 in Hamburg, 1910, scoring 8/12 (67%) vs 2653-rated opposition
2729 in Mieses-Spielmann Match (Regensburg), 1910, scoring 6/8 (75%) vs 2640-rated opposition
2721 in Bad Pistyan, 1912, scoring 7.5/11 (68%) vs 2641-rated opposition
2721 in Bogoljubow-Spielmann Match (Semmering), 1932, scoring 5.5/10 (55%) vs 2729-rated opposition
2717 in Teplitz-Schoenau, 1922, scoring 7.5/11 (68%) vs 2635-rated opposition
2713 in Mannheim, 1914, scoring 7/10 (70%) vs 2628-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10027 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2807 in Janowsky-Marshall II (Paris), 1905, scoring 10/17 (59%) vs 2770-rated opposition
2803 in Cambridge Springs, 1904, scoring 7/9 (78%) vs 2702-rated opposition
2757 in Paris, 1900, scoring 9.5/15 (63%) vs 2690-rated opposition
2752 in Nuremberg, 1906, scoring 10/13 (77%) vs 2606-rated opposition
2743 in Ostend, 1907, scoring 11.5/20 (58%) vs 2697-rated opposition
2740 in San Sebastian, 1911, scoring 8/13 (62%) vs 2693-rated opposition
2732 in Karlsbad, 1911, scoring 10/16 (63%) vs 2662-rated opposition
2731 in Janowsky-Marshall IV (Biarritz), 1912, scoring 7/9 (78%) vs 2614-rated opposition
2718 in London, 1927, scoring 6.5/9 (72%) vs 2630-rated opposition
2714 in Monte Carlo, 1904, scoring 6.5/10 (65%) vs 2660-rated opposition
2709 in Barmen, 1905, scoring 8.5/13 (65%) vs 2630-rated opposition
2707 in Janowsky-Marshall V (New York), 1916, scoring 5.5/8 (69%) vs 2649-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10029 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2833 in New York, 1918, scoring 6/6 (100%) vs 2682-rated opposition
2827 in New York, 1927, scoring 14/20 (70%) vs 2703-rated opposition
2819 in St. Petersburg, 1914, scoring 11/16 (69%) vs 2720-rated opposition
2817 in Capablanca-Kostic Match (Havana), 1919, scoring 5/5 (100%) vs 2696-rated opposition
2792 in Berlin, 1928, scoring 9.5/13 (73%) vs 2678-rated opposition
2792 in New York, 1924, scoring 13/18 (72%) vs 2655-rated opposition
2788 in Capablanca-Marshall Match (New York), 1909, scoring 15/23 (65%) vs 2684-rated opposition
2787 in Moscow, 1936, scoring 13/18 (72%) vs 2650-rated opposition
2781 in San Sebastian, 1911, scoring 9/13 (69%) vs 2690-rated opposition
2770 in Karlsbad, 1929, scoring 14/20 (70%) vs 2638-rated opposition
2760 in Moscow, 1925, scoring 10/14 (71%) vs 2645-rated opposition
2754 in Nottingham, 1936, scoring 10/14 (71%) vs 2638-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10031 |
|
|
|
|
(no graph available) |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10033 |
|
|
|
|
Best Performances:
2763 in San Sebastian, 1911, scoring 8.5/13 (65%) vs 2695-rated opposition
2744 in Hastings, 1925, scoring 8.5/9 (94%) vs 2532-rated opposition
2718 in Semmering, 1926, scoring 10.5/15 (70%) vs 2600-rated opposition
2713 in New York, 1927, scoring 10/20 (50%) vs 2716-rated opposition
2712 in London, 1922, scoring 6.5/10 (65%) vs 2658-rated opposition |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10034 |
|
|
|
|
(no graph available) |
|
|
| номер сообщения: 150-11-10036 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Copyright chesspro.ru 2004-2024 гг. |
|
|
|
